In UK the purchase and provision of healthcare was split up between National Health Services or NHS and Government funded GP fund holders, this increased efficiency as the hospitals now needed to provide low cost procedures to win both patients and funds.
It emphasized the centrality of citizens who were the recipient of the services or customers to the public sector.
The critical aspects of this new model were: Now, the origin of this new term was to propose a new point of view towards the organizational design in the public sector, however after a decade, the meaning of this term in discussions and debates became many. Organizational culture was seen as a glue which holds the organization together, judging the performance by results etc were the new point of views In the top down form of organization- Securing changes in organizational culture was cited as important, clarifying and projecting the vision and leadership from top to down was asked for, private sector emerged as a role model for the neo style public sector, training, corporate logos, communication strategies, assertive HR and all the other aspects that are characteristic jargon of private sector were encouraged to be adopted So, basically the new public management was a radical movement to change not just the way a public sector functions but also the entire perception about it.
In a bottom up form of organization- Organizational development and learning was gaining importance. Before we make an effort to further understand the various aspects of New Public Management, let us see how it is different from the traditional public administration.
New public management system also proposed a more decentralized control of resources and exploring other service delivery models to achieve better results, including a quasi-market structure where public and private service providers competed with each other in an attempt to provide better and faster services.
The core themes for the New Public Management were: Some scholars choose to define it as the introduction of new institutional economics to public management and some used it to refer to pattern changes in policy making.
The new public management which emerged in the s represented an attempt to make the public sector more businesslike and to improve the efficiency of the Government borrowed ideas and management models from the private sector.New Public Management: An Introduction by Jan-Erik Lane New public management is a topical phrase to describe how management techniques from the private sector are now being applied to public services.
The term new public management was coined by scholars from UK and Australia (Hood and Hood and Jackson ), who were working in the in the areas of public administration.
Now, the origin of this new term was to propose a new point of view towards the organizational design in the public sector. Public management also known as new public management is singled out for its great emphasis on decentralisation of authority, downsizing of the public sector through privatisation of state enterprises, strict management of performance in a goal directed and result oriented manner, market-centric management, complex interdependence.
New public management is a topical phrase to describe how management techniques from the private sector are now being applied to public services.
This book provides a completely up-to-date overview of the main theoretical models of public sector management, and examines the key changes that have.
New public management is a topical phrase to describe how management techniques from the private sector are now being applied to public services. introduction of performance management systems, the increase in the responsibility of public administrators, the introduction of market mechanisms into public sector, the introduction of quality management techniques, among.Download