Life cycle assessment of biodiesel production essay

Understanding farmers, feedstock options, and land use Biomass production for biofuels could displace existing products from land currently used for food, forage and fiber, which could increase the price of these goods in global markets.

First, the study was not designed to present conclusions on the appropriate policies to promote the use of biodiesel. The results obtained show that approximately To this end, an exergo-environmental life cycle assessment was applied.

However, this difference is only 6.

In any case, since the calorific value provided by human labor accounts for a negligible fraction of the total energy, this can be excluded without introducing much error. It should be noted that while assessing biodiesel for renewability, only the nonrenewable fuel that went into production is counted.

Abstract The main purpose of this study is to comprehensively investigate a biodiesel production system by transesterification of mutton tallow. In other words it makes a difference where these emissions occur. For urban bus operators, this translates into improved public relations.

In contrast, environmental life cycle assessment identifies the environmental hot spot subsystems of the entire mutton tallow-to-biodiesel system the highest priority life cycle steps for environmental improvement.

Biodiesel Life-Cycle Summary

Geographical variability also influences other factors, including soil carbon impacts and water demand consequences. The study notes there is on-going research to discover the relationship between exposure to diesel soot and cancerous growths in mice.

Therefore, a researcher must limit the system boundary used in the analysis and still provide a meaningful EgLCA. Previous article in issue. Life-cycle energy is the energy consumed in producing a specific input.

The renewability assumption would be unarguably true if there were no nonrenewable resources such as diesel and gasoline used in the biodiesel production process. GHG emission impacts are distributed over decades and even centuries using integrated assessment models, and are often discounted.

These studies often have widely differing results because the inputs were different, the assumptions were different, and the energy inputs were divided differently among the various products of the process biodiesel, oilseed meal, and crude glycerin. Accounting for time in impact assessments — Air emission impacts from tailpipes and production facilities accrue within years and can be allocated to the year of emissions without discounting.

Predicting biofuel production technologies and practices — Many options exist for biofuel production processes and final products. With these caveats in mind, the major findings of the study are: The feasibility of all processes was proven and the biodiesel obtained had good specifications.

This process has lower investment costs but the process of alkaline catalysis with acid pre-treatment, whose main raw material is waste oil, is much more profitable and has less environmental impacts. Human food consumption should not be included as an energy input from labor because it does not aid in answering the renewability question, and it creates a circular reference within the system boundary.

This paper investigates the production of biodiesel from sheep tallow. Incorporating spatial heterogeneity in inventories and assessments — The health consequences of pollutant emissions vary depending upon where the pollutant is released, with factors such as proximity to large populations looming large.

If the system boundaries that is, what is included and what is excluded from accounting were different for two comparable biofuel systems, comparing their performance would not only be meaningless, but also dangerously misleading.

Therefore, the biodiesel system presents a net energy gain. Instead, the study was designed to provide policy makers with comparative information that they could use to formulate appropriate policies regarding biodiesel.Energy Life Cycle Analysis of Biodiesel. The process is also called “energy life-cycle assessment.” Energy life cycle analysis is different from Environmental Life Cycle Analysis The “energy inputs” of biodiesel production include not only the energy used in the process of converting oil to biodiesel, but also could include the.

Energy Life Cycle Analysis of Biodiesel

Life Cycle Assessment of Biodiesel Production - Introduction The transportation of goods and people has dramatically altered earth’s landscape. The ease of mobility has enhanced and increased the transportation of everything. Essay about Life Cycle Assessment of Biomass for Bioenergy - Life Cycle Assessment by the Example of Biomass for Bioenergy 1.

Introduction: With the current energy policies and management, world market energy consumption is projected to increase by 44% from to (IEO, ). High production yields of microalgae have called forth interest of economic and scientific actors but it is still unclear whether the production of biodiesel is environmentally interesting and which transformation steps need further adjustment and optimization.

Grease trap waste (GTW) is a low-quality waste material with variable lipid content that is an untapped resource for producing biodiesel.

Challenges for Biofuels – New Life Cycle Assessment Report from Energy Biosciences Institute

Compared to conventional biodiesel feedstocks, GTW requires different and additional processing steps for biodiesel production due to its heterogeneous composition, high acidity, and high sulfur content. Life-cycle analysis and the ecology of biofuels Sarah C. Davis1,2, life-cycle analysis (LCA), a computational tool for asses-sing the efficiency and greenhouse gas (GHG) impact of energy systems, to biofuel feedstocks.

Published values accuracy of LCA for biofuel production systems.

Life cycle assessment of biodiesel production essay
Rated 5/5 based on 65 review