Two people on opposing lines shoot; one Man he killed left dead and the other still enjoys the ability to be able to reflect on the actions.
Whatever the reason, the speaker seems to grow very contemplative after this experience. Many a poets, philosophers and socio political thinkers have lifted their pens on this topic, but all of their observations are referential.
African and Boer farms were systematically destroyed and Boer civilians were herded into concentration camps. These format choices make the poem almost like a nursery rhyme in its simplicity, providing an ironic contrast to its unpleasant subject.
It shows mastry of the poet in handling the theme in mature poetical style. After serving in World War I, e. Because he balks at drawing the obvious conclusion, the reader is forced to do it for him and conclude that war is murderous and wrong.
The poem turns on the character of the speaker revealed in his reactions to what has taken place. In both poems there is a sense that the soldiers are "homely". The speaker talks casually and warmly of the inn, creating a setting that harshly contrasts with the battlefield where he encountered this man.
How might those differences change our attitudes toward his death? You also need to include an element of personal reflection and response to the poems.
The speaker Man he killed by stating that he had no personal quarrel with the man he killed. The British, numerically and economically superior to the Boers, were confident that their uncouth enemy could be rapidly defeated.
The soldier feels uneasy, knows he must follow orders, yet is not convinced that what he was told to do is right. Had the Boer soldier been met in such as place as the inn, in the local place of the British soldier, they would have been fellows and friends. The homeliness is exaggerated in The Man He Killed through the use of dialect terms like "nipperkin".
In the last stanza, the poet tries to summarize his philosophy for killing the other man who does have the same blood and flesh like we do have.
Great Britain was the most powerful nation in the world, with colonies on all five continents. He reintroduces war scenarios such as the feeling of guilt and being immobilized by a feeling. But he had no chance to offer the Dorset man a pint of beer; their meeting in his home means that they are already enemies.
It appears as though he has set aside his misgivings. Both poems explore the impact on individuals. The speaker, being so focused on the man he shot, does not give any insight into what he felt at having been the man to walk away.
The first stanza is so warm-hearted and lacking in rancor, it belies the fact that he killed the man about whom he is speaking.
He creates a voice not his own to speak in his poems, and this is indicated by the quotation marks bracketing the poem. The British, however, had an overwhelming numerical advantage.
The unpolitical man, doing his duty without ambition or understanding, experiences this history as a kind of fate that colors invader and invaded alike with its grey strokes. Britain fought an unpopular war against the Boers, an enemy that relied on guerrilla tactics instead of traditional modes of warfare.
We do it to sustain the order of our governments. He says he killed him because he was a foe. Idiom, specific and concrete words, and rhyming are all combined to form the diction of the poem, which enhance the impact and focus of the ideas and emotions. Hardy makes his readers ponder the question of whether this rural man should feel loyalty to the country that is his dwelling place and native home, the land and people of Dorset, or to the bigger country that has its national interests in southern Africa and its armies to protect them.
Its straightforward style makes the book highly readable. Following what was termed the Great Trekthe Boers and the British managed to coexist peacefully. Colonists from neighboring Rhodesia attempted to invade the Transvaal and to provoke an uprising of Uitlanders which would definitively defeat the Boers.
The soldier is confused and repeating the word at the end leaving the soldier in pieces. Yet, his inherent generosity and friendliness defines him; it is clearly not in his nature to kill. Perhaps it was because of his background in fiction that Hardy often chose dramatic monologue as a poetic format.The Man He KilledThomas Hardy Author BiographyPoem TextPoem SummaryThemesStyleHistorical ContextCritical OverviewCriticismSourcesFor Further Study Source for information on The Man He Killed: Poetry for Students dictionary.
Feb 11, · Summary of Key Points Structure and Form A dramatic monologue - voice of a soldier returned from Boer War Five quatrains, regular ABAB rhyme scheme and.
“Had he and I but met. One of the most renowned poets and novelists in English literary history, Thomas Hardy was born in in the English village of Higher Bockhampton in the county of Dorset. The Man He Killed by Thomas Hardy. The Man He Killed Learning Guide by PhD students from Stanford, Harvard, Berkeley.
"The Man He Killed" is a poem written by Thomas Hardy. Written init was first published in Harper's Weekly, Nov. 8 The first book publication was in his Time's Laughingstocks and Other Verses (London: Macmillan, ).
The Man He Killed by Thomas mint-body.com he and I but met By some old ancient inn We should have set us down to wet Right many a nipperkin But ranged as infantry And staring face to face. Page/5(11).Download